Skip to main content

It Literally is a Circus in There

Movie Review: Water for Elephants (2011)
Summary: A veterinary student abandons his studies after his parents are killed and joins a traveling circus as their vet.
Spoilers: none

It’s title sounds so mundane that it manages to get some due attention.

Water for Elephants stars Reese Witherspoon, Eclipse’s Robert Pattinson, and Inglourious Basterds’ Christoph Waltz (who so effectively played “General Landa” that it made our skin crawl).

Arrayed in new and mostly well-defined character constructs, the three come before us in a romance with a very peculiar setting—in the days of the traveling circus (early 1930s).

After the tragedy of losing his parents and their family home, “Jacob Jankowski” (Pattinson), a veterinary student on the brink of getting his license, finds work with Berdini’s Circus in efforts to make a new life for himself. But his challenges won’t just come from the sad past he is trying to forget, but from his current work under the circus’ owner, “August” (Waltz), a cruel and villainous boss and husband to the woman of Jacob’s desire, “Marlena” (Witherspoon).

The movie comes to us from the New York Times bestselling novel by Sara Gruen, offering a very interesting and well-created look back into a bygone era. Nudging itself into worthy viewing status, Water for Elephants is history-lesson-style story delivery told in the first person by an aged Jacob (Hal Holbrook), who describes in vivid detail a world unknown to most of us. The film’s complex characterizations and robust performances are what endow it with its charming aura, particularly in the case of Waltz who brilliantly portrays a temperamental ringleader interested only in cash-flow.

Working up the latter in an unregulated industry full of abuses and who knows how many labor laws violations, Jacob graduates from mostly menial duties to providing water and medical care for an elephant named “Rosey,” the circus’ main attraction.

But don’t be confused; Water for Elephants is not a warmhearted animal movie, nor is it a conventionally winning romance to be followed by an evening of nooky. It is a story of secret love, which, for lack of better phraseology, degenerates into a story of payback against a cruel and heartless man. It’s more about an insane circus owner than the animals or the romance.

Backsliding to increase the drama (which is curiously lacking on the part of Pattinson himself throughout the film), the movie revolves around rising conflicts with August from Jacob and Marlena’s flirtatious play. We have alternating moments of tension at the dinner table between the three, mixed with the beginning hints of romance, and animal cruelty, but no real heart or chemistry between the two main stars.

We have a cruel boss who nearly kills Jacob for his humanitarian instincts, and a story of forbidden love. But our story never becomes anything—not a romance, but a splintered drama that focuses on the neurosis of the villain. There’s not much of a point to this, and it’s questionable whether or not the movie accomplished what it wanted to, but it is the robust performances that make the grade here.

Of note is the care the movie takes in portraying people mindful of the consequences of their actions. Character traits like flaws do not comprise the whole character makeup, but small segments of a personality. The originality of the film’s premise, the detail taken to recreate a 1930s-era environment, solid acting, and firmly imprinted characters make the movie.

(JH)

Grade: C+ (2 ½ stars)
Rated: PG-13 (for sexual suggestiveness, violence, smoking and alcohol, and language)
Director: Francis Lawrence
Starring: “Marlena” (Reese Witherspoon), “Old Jacob Jankowski” (Hal Holbrook), “Young Jacob Jankowski” (Robert Pattinson), “August” (Christoph Waltz), “Charlie” (Paul Schneider), “Kinko / Walter” (Jim Norton), “Grady” (Richard Blake)
Genre: Drama / Romance
Trailer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Jesus Turns Down the Glory: 10 Worst Ever Christian Songs

It’s a sad testimony when even the creator of a thing realizes that the product isn’t what it was intended to be. Well, actually it’s a good thing. It just doesn’t happen often enough. The Christian music industry is, shall we say, not up to par with where its admirers (and even creators and ardent well-wishers) would hope it would be. And when even the average believer realizes that their music is not market-cornering stuff, all should know that there is a problem.

Now not all Christian music sucks (you might even find a few rock songs from artists like Petra on Joe Holman’s ipod that he still sometimes listens to and enjoys), but what makes the stuff that does suck suck is that what sucks sucks for a number of different reasons. We begin the countdown going from best of the worst to absolute worst...

The Top 5 Most Powerful Beings in Sci-fi (Part I of II)

It’s a subject that is rarely tackled in any form outside of random questions on a message board, but here we will devote a sensible examination of it. Who – what – is the most powerful being anywhere in every realm of sci-fi or fantasy ever dreamt up by a finite human being? I’ve been contemplating this subject since I was 8 years old. At 39, it hasn’t left my mind. That means several things; (1) I’m a fucking geek. (2) I’ve invested enough of my life pondering this for it to qualify as an obsession.

As with all “Most” anything lists, we are faced with several problems, one of them being limited source material. A couple of these only made one or two brief appearances somewhere and that is all we have to go by. But sometimes, those situations let our imaginations go into overdrive and give us even more creative fun. The mystery tends to add to the experience of contemplation.

Movie Review: Blair Witch (2016)